Skip to main content

Super Bowl half time show


Super Bowl halftime show was one of the best halftime shows I got to see in my lifetime. Although top five are Prince because come on the rain when he was singing purple rain was too perfect. Second pick is Michael Jackson because the crowd was nuts and he is a one of kind performer. Third is lady Gaga she jumped from the roof and was sing all through her choreography which is difficult skill. Fourth right but might bump up to third is this years Shakira and J-lo. And fifth would be Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake aside from the wardrobe malfunction it was amazing back and fourth performance between the two artists. Now, back to Shakira and J-lo performance it was a proud moment for me has a LatinaX women to see inclusion on television. And especially important to see a strong women on dominated industry run by men. Shakira right from the start of the show to end showed off her skill level that she not only deserves to perform at the super bowl but in United States because she is a performer from her choreography, electric guitar and kickass drum playing and multi language speaker. She out did some of the best performers with exception of Prince and Michael Jackson. She is the one of top diverse artist in this generation. It’s unfortunate that some people do not welcome her with open arms or even on job well down. They are fixed on the fact that she is not an American artist. But they are right she not American artist she is much better than them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Response to New Media In Art: Introduction: Pg7-18

In the book, New Media in Art,  by Michael Rush mentions artists in the last century are experimenting more with mix media (7).  Incorporating readymade objects, personal trinkets, and recyclable objects, focusing on the emotion rather than technical skills. Rush references a famous artist, Marcel Duchamp that changed the focus of what is a fine art. Duchamp for example famous piece controversial "fountain" sculpture was not considered art because it was ready-made that had no creat. However, it is an art because it was Duchamp protest towards the Art Galleries and Museums because who are they decide what is art. Art does not have definitive rules of what qualifies as art, there might be tasteful art and distasteful art (22). I think it should be up to the artist and audience to consider what is art, tasteful otherwise.

Response to Hard Cash: A History of Artists Using Money as a Metaphor BY ANDREW RUSSETH

K Foundation's performance  K Foundation Burn a Million Quid , Aug. 23, 1995 Andrew Ruesseth mentions a couple artist including Andy Warhol, and the infamous banana on the wall piece of art. And how much is art worth? A comment on society's values of high art which raises the question of what makes using money in art wrong. Burning it to make a statement that we put so much value in a piece a paper that all it is a piece of paper. Or using precious gemstones that valued high rate already why make a ridiculous medium out of it. Because why not that how most people live their lives thinking about money. Either you have a lot of it or live paycheck to paycheck. And if you live middle class all you do is hope you live to move up or down.

Response: New Media in Art : CH4 "The Digital Art" 180-199

A German artist by the name of Andreas Gursky photo manipulated laborers to make seem that were over thousands of workers in one building. And the photograph makes you think about where all materialistic phones, clothing, tablets things. I think we all know it comes from but what we do not like to think about is the amount of labor and conditions of the environment.