birds of prey and the fantabulous emancipation of one Harley Quinn

First and foremost this movie was awesome in my opinion the fights scenes in this all female lead were choreographed nicely. It flowed really well there was some comic relief style fighting within the movie. But one thing that stands out is the new title “Harley Quinn and birds of prey” vs “birds of prey and the fantabulous emancipation of one Harley Quinn” which in retro spec should have be done since the beginning. And main reason it was changed was for more people to buy tickets to see the movie. That kinda sucks because it is a good storyline it is mostly about Harley Quinn but has nice blend of characters Ewan McGregor villain was diabolical in the best way. Go see the movie. Like right now.

Comments

Response to New Media In Art: Introduction: Pg7-18

In the book, New Media in Art, by Michael Rush mentions artists in the last century are experimenting more with mix media (7). Incorporating readymade objects, personal trinkets, and recyclable objects, focusing on the emotion rather than technical skills. Rush references a famous artist, Marcel Duchamp that changed the focus of what is a fine art. Duchamp for example famous piece controversial "fountain" sculpture was not considered art because it was ready-made that had no creat. However, it is an art because it was Duchamp protest towards the Art Galleries and Museums because who are they decide what is art. Art does not have definitive rules of what qualifies as art, there might be tasteful art and distasteful art (22). I think it should be up to the artist and audience to consider what is art, tasteful otherwise.

Response: New Media in Art Ch4 200-222

In this section of chapter four Michael Rush speaks briefly about the internet although vast and global not yet affordable for everyone (222). As artists find new ways to distribute their artwork online. The book discusses various websites that artist constructed another piece of artwork for hosting their work. Similarly, museums seem obsolete because now artist have a way commissioning their work cutting out the middle man. And there no rules of how obscenity are pushed. Which good and bad for viewers and artist.

Response to Hard Cash: A History of Artists Using Money as a Metaphor BY ANDREW RUSSETH

K Foundation's performance K Foundation Burn a Million Quid , Aug. 23, 1995 Andrew Ruesseth mentions a couple artist including Andy Warhol, and the infamous banana on the wall piece of art. And how much is art worth? A comment on society's values of high art which raises the question of what makes using money in art wrong. Burning it to make a statement that we put so much value in a piece a paper that all it is a piece of paper. Or using precious gemstones that valued high rate already why make a ridiculous medium out of it. Because why not that how most people live their lives thinking about money. Either you have a lot of it or live paycheck to paycheck. And if you live middle class all you do is hope you live to move up or down.

ashley.montesDTC355

Search This Blog